Category talk:Level Gear - Revision history

Llanor at 00:37, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T00:37:22Z

DaveGarber1975 at 22:09, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T22:09:59Z

DaveGarber1975 at 21:28, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T21:28:31Z

Llanor at 11:09, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T11:09:06Z

DaveGarber1975 at 08:00, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T08:00:12Z

DaveGarber1975 at 07:47, 7 February 2007

2007-02-07T07:47:25Z

New page

Yes, offhand, the [[:Category: Statistic Gear |Statistic Gear]] category makes this [[:Category: Level Gear |Level Gear]] category a bit redundant. However...

People talk about "[[:Category: Level Gear |level gear]]" all the time on the MUD. When they come here, I think that they ought to be able to find a page or category entitled "[[:Category: Level Gear |level gear]]." Nobody would think to look for "[[:Category: Statistic Gear |statistic gear]]" offhand.

However, [[:Category: Str Gear |str gear]] and [[:Category: Dex Gear |dex gear]] are definitely not considered "level gear" and I thought that it would be techincally inaccurate to include them under this category; however, I thought that all five deserved to be in a single category, which is why I put all five under [[:Category: Statistic Gear |Statistic Gear]].

So, I thought that a little redundancy would be advantageous in this case. What do you think?

--[[User:DaveGarber1975|Dave Garber]] 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:37, 8 February 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::I played around with it this way for a bit and, to me, it doesn't seem like an improvement in how things are organized. Ummm, I feel kinda bad for doing this but will it drive you nuts if I change it back again? crosses fingers --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 16:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)		::I played around with it this way for a bit and, to me, it doesn't seem like an improvement in how things are organized. Ummm, I feel kinda bad for doing this but will it drive you nuts if I change it back again? crosses fingers --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 16:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::It woudln't, but next time if something hasn't been consented we'd best just discuss first, instead of change first. Or not? --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 18:37, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 7 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear\|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)		:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear\|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)

−	::I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I had a similar difference of opinion about the [[:Category_talk: Spellcasting Gear \|~~Spellcasting Gear~~]] ~~category~~. --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)	+	::I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I (poor Waite! lol) had a similar difference of opinion about the Spellcasting Gear category. Click [[:Category_talk: Spellcasting Gear \|here]] to see our discussion. --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::I played around with it this way for a bit and, to me, it doesn't seem like an improvement in how things are organized. Ummm, I feel kinda bad for doing this but will it drive you nuts if I change it back again? crosses fingers --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 16:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 7 February 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear\|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)		:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear\|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::I favor putting these categories in parallel as they are, rather than putting one category underneath the other category. But, that's my personal preference and I may be a bit crazy. Waite and I had a similar difference of opinion about the [[:Category_talk: Spellcasting Gear \|Spellcasting Gear]] category. --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 7 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)		In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:Ok, how about this? Level Gear as a subcategory of Statistic gear. A link from the template to [[:Category:Statistic Gear\|Stat & Level Gear]]. In there, the subcategory Level Gear shoud be clearly visible. But it's pointless to link to both Stat and Level gear separately from the template. --[[User:MooNFisH\|Llanor]] 05:09, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:00, 7 February 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	--[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST)		--[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 01:47, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	In any case, it's awfully dang easy to change and change back again with these Templates. I love 'em! Three cheers for MooNFisH!!! --[[User:DaveGarber1975\|Dave Garber]] 02:00, 7 February 2007 (CST)