Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Brandies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PirateHero (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place | i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place | ||
-elfangwor | -elfangwor | ||
+ | |||
+ | Seems like the idea you were going with was lots of seperate pages and categories -- that's why you have seperate area and gear in area pages. Might as well stick with that and make them all seperate.<br> | ||
+ | On a semi-related note, should we have a page for 'junk' stuff? stuff with no special attributes or useless ones (crappy AC-only gear, create spring spells, crappy gems, etc.)?<br> | ||
+ | -PirateHero |
Revision as of 20:20, 29 April 2005
What do you guys think, should we keep all pills, pots, wands and staves in one category, or should we split them up?
Brandies
I would add seperate subcats for each
-RSparkyC
i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place -elfangwor
Seems like the idea you were going with was lots of seperate pages and categories -- that's why you have seperate area and gear in area pages. Might as well stick with that and make them all seperate.
On a semi-related note, should we have a page for 'junk' stuff? stuff with no special attributes or useless ones (crappy AC-only gear, create spring spells, crappy gems, etc.)?
-PirateHero