Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Races"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Sounds great, thanks for your work. I'll add areas, races, classes, and gear to the navigation panel. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 15:14, 15 May 2007 (CDT) | Sounds great, thanks for your work. I'll add areas, races, classes, and gear to the navigation panel. [[User:Waite|Waite]] 15:14, 15 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Done. --[[User:MooNFisH|Llanor]] 16:41, 15 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Added a new highlight color for unusually good stats (demonseed dex, faerie wisdom, goblin/kobold TNL) both so they stand out as above and beyond the normal range, and so the more normal races' 3rd best values can stand out like they should. --[[User:Neyne|Neyne]] 21:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:24, 9 August 2010
Ok.. same thing for Races and Classes as what I just did with Areas. Want me to do these as well?
I mean, they're only supposed to be under ascension races, creatable races, remort races etc instead of under Races as well. Same for prc's and remort classes under classes. --Llanor 15:08, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Sounds great, thanks for your work. I'll add areas, races, classes, and gear to the navigation panel. Waite 15:14, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
- Done. --Llanor 16:41, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Added a new highlight color for unusually good stats (demonseed dex, faerie wisdom, goblin/kobold TNL) both so they stand out as above and beyond the normal range, and so the more normal races' 3rd best values can stand out like they should. --Neyne 21:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
