Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tanking In Hit Gear"
WinterRose (talk | contribs) |
(→Discussion of Edits: new section) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
: Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST) | : Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --[[User:WinterRose|WinterRose]] 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Discussion of Edits == | ||
+ | |||
+ | A table is not much of a 'full-blown analysis.' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Armor optimization is not required to 'fine-tune the DR/AC aspects' | ||
+ | |||
+ | I don't see how tanking in mixed gear is the preferred way to roll as a lowhero lowhp caster. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. Explanation of |
Revision as of 03:55, 11 March 2012
I think your math is off on this part:
"When runed it's virtually the same as a double-brilled LeMans Family Seal, making it an ideal replacement"
base AC (12) + natural modifier (10) + dbrill (6) = 28
2 AC runes = 15
Trading 13 AC for 10 HR/DR is still a pretty good deal, but not quite as good as you make it out to be. Waite 10:23, 9 March 2012 (EST)
- Ack yes, you're right of course, too much distractions. Thanx for checking. --WinterRose 10:08, 9 March 2012 (CST)
Discussion of Edits
A table is not much of a 'full-blown analysis.'
Armor optimization is not required to 'fine-tune the DR/AC aspects'
I don't see how tanking in mixed gear is the preferred way to roll as a lowhero lowhp caster.
You do not typically gain a "few hundred" AC when switching to solo gear.
Inclusion of information that can be obtained from another Wiki page makes for a tangled mess. Explanation of