Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glorious Conquest"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added ogr, hie and tua to ranking) |
m (added gorn to ranking) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
dwf (+5%) > ogr (+3%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gno, ,hie, liz, spr, trl, tua(+0%) <br> | dwf (+5%) > ogr (+3%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gno, ,hie, liz, spr, trl, tua(+0%) <br> | ||
| − | tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%?) '''Assuming a base of 5%''' | + | tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%+?<small>current minimum estimate</small>) > gor (-7%) '''Assuming a base of 5%''' |
--[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT) | --[[User:Shadowtop|Shadowtop]] 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 21 March 2014
Seem to have enough data to start drawing some conclusions:
dwf (+5%) > ogr (+3%) > cen (+1%) > dgn, drw, elf, gno, ,hie, liz, spr, trl, tua(+0%)
tor, wer (+10%) > bhy (+6%) > qxl (+5%) > kra (+4%) > ath (+0%) > shz (-2%) > tul (-5%+?current minimum estimate) > gor (-7%) Assuming a base of 5%
--Shadowtop 16:32, 6 June 2013 (EDT)
More ath values would be great, hm, but hard to get these. Having Tor and Werredan both at +10% makes this spell actually not that Werredan-centric at all. -- WinterRose 03:36, 7 June 2013 (EDT)
- It's possible that there is an upper limit for this bonus of 20%, if so, Tor could have a stronger bonus... but that's just speculation. --Shadowtop 09:41, 25 August 2013 (EDT)
i am of the opinion that the worship tables do something along these lines: Wer 14% Tor 10% Kra 8% Bhy 6% Qxl 5% Ath 0% Dur Rxa Grn -3% Tul Shz and the inherent racial mod gets added to this. - Qemoi
