Difference between revisions of "User:WinterRose/Morph Data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WinterRose (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Set 1 == * Running all records drom May 2011 to December 2012, for a total of 2197 entry points. * Aggregating all levels into groups of 10 via rounding (304 goes to 300, 305...") |
WinterRose (talk | contribs) m (moved Morph Data to User:WinterRose/Morph Data) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
'''Conclusion:''' While 2200 points seems a lot, it's actually not, thus the huge variations. | '''Conclusion:''' While 2200 points seems a lot, it's actually not, thus the huge variations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Set 1 (more rounding) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Increasing grain size to blocks of 20 (level=level/20, level=round(level), level=level*20) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | ||
+ | | level | successes | total tries | chance | | ||
+ | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | ||
+ | | 300 | 39 | 232 | 16.8103 | | ||
+ | | 320 | 22 | 109 | 20.1835 | | ||
+ | | 340 | 12 | 62 | 19.3548 | | ||
+ | | 360 | 32 | 128 | 25.0000 | | ||
+ | | 380 | 40 | 123 | 32.5203 | | ||
+ | | 400 | 48 | 134 | 35.8209 | | ||
+ | | 420 | 44 | 138 | 31.8841 | | ||
+ | | 440 | 54 | 125 | 43.2000 | | ||
+ | | 460 | 47 | 114 | 41.2281 | | ||
+ | | 480 | 42 | 91 | 46.1538 | | ||
+ | | 500 | 71 | 141 | 50.3546 | | ||
+ | | 520 | 47 | 102 | 46.0784 | | ||
+ | | 540 | 40 | 69 | 57.9710 | | ||
+ | | 560 | 39 | 68 | 57.3529 | | ||
+ | | 580 | 19 | 32 | 59.3750 | | ||
+ | | 600 | 34 | 60 | 56.6667 | | ||
+ | | 620 | 28 | 37 | 75.6757 | | ||
+ | | 640 | 14 | 27 | 51.8519 | | ||
+ | | 660 | 16 | 27 | 59.2593 | | ||
+ | | 680 | 17 | 19 | 89.4737 | | ||
+ | | 700 | 17 | 25 | 68.0000 | | ||
+ | | 720 | 10 | 13 | 76.9231 | | ||
+ | | 740 | 4 | 5 | 80.0000 | | ||
+ | | 760 | 9 | 13 | 69.2308 | | ||
+ | | 780 | 11 | 13 | 84.6154 | | ||
+ | | 800 | 13 | 14 | 92.8571 | | ||
+ | | 820 | 7 | 7 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | | 840 | 3 | 5 | 60.0000 | | ||
+ | | 860 | 5 | 5 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | | 880 | 1 | 2 | 50.0000 | | ||
+ | | 900 | 5 | 5 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | | 920 | 7 | 8 | 87.5000 | | ||
+ | | 940 | 5 | 6 | 83.3333 | | ||
+ | | 960 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | | 980 | 6 | 6 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | | 1000 | 230 | 230 | 100.0000 | | ||
+ | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Conclusion:''' A dataset of 10k would really be more useful. Oh well. |
Latest revision as of 06:49, 21 December 2012
Set 1
- Running all records drom May 2011 to December 2012, for a total of 2197 entry points.
- Aggregating all levels into groups of 10 via rounding (304 goes to 300, 305 goes to 310 group)
+-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | level | successes | total tries | chance | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | 300 | 31 | 191 | 16.2304 | | 310 | 14 | 82 | 17.0732 | | 320 | 15 | 56 | 26.7857 | | 330 | 4 | 23 | 17.3913 | | 340 | 7 | 37 | 18.9189 | | 350 | 3 | 39 | 7.6923 | | 360 | 26 | 75 | 34.6667 | | 370 | 16 | 62 | 25.8065 | | 380 | 23 | 69 | 33.3333 | | 390 | 11 | 46 | 23.9130 | | 400 | 32 | 70 | 45.7143 | | 410 | 19 | 67 | 28.3582 | | 420 | 24 | 74 | 32.4324 | | 430 | 26 | 66 | 39.3939 | | 440 | 29 | 65 | 44.6154 | | 450 | 24 | 61 | 39.3443 | | 460 | 22 | 50 | 44.0000 | | 470 | 21 | 59 | 35.5932 | | 480 | 24 | 46 | 52.1739 | | 490 | 13 | 25 | 52.0000 | | 500 | 45 | 97 | 46.3918 | | 510 | 30 | 63 | 47.6190 | | 520 | 30 | 56 | 53.5714 | | 530 | 17 | 32 | 53.1250 | | 540 | 22 | 40 | 55.0000 | | 550 | 18 | 35 | 51.4286 | | 560 | 25 | 38 | 65.7895 | | 570 | 11 | 20 | 55.0000 | | 580 | 11 | 17 | 64.7059 | | 590 | 8 | 16 | 50.0000 | | 600 | 21 | 39 | 53.8462 | | 610 | 13 | 19 | 68.4211 | | 620 | 19 | 24 | 79.1667 | | 630 | 7 | 15 | 46.6667 | | 640 | 7 | 13 | 53.8462 | | 650 | 6 | 7 | 85.7143 | | 660 | 12 | 15 | 80.0000 | | 670 | 8 | 17 | 47.0588 | | 680 | 5 | 5 | 100.0000 | | 690 | 10 | 11 | 90.9091 | | 700 | 11 | 18 | 61.1111 | | 710 | 5 | 6 | 83.3333 | | 720 | 4 | 5 | 80.0000 | | 730 | 4 | 6 | 66.6667 | | 750 | 8 | 10 | 80.0000 | | 760 | 3 | 5 | 60.0000 | | 770 | 2 | 4 | 50.0000 | | 780 | 8 | 9 | 88.8889 | | 790 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 800 | 10 | 11 | 90.9091 | | 810 | 3 | 3 | 100.0000 | | 820 | 7 | 7 | 100.0000 | | 840 | 2 | 4 | 50.0000 | | 850 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 860 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 870 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 880 | 1 | 2 | 50.0000 | | 890 | 1 | 1 | 100.0000 | | 900 | 4 | 4 | 100.0000 | | 910 | 3 | 4 | 75.0000 | | 920 | 3 | 3 | 100.0000 | | 930 | 2 | 3 | 66.6667 | | 940 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 950 | 3 | 3 | 100.0000 | | 960 | 1 | 1 | 100.0000 | | 970 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 980 | 4 | 4 | 100.0000 | | 990 | 3 | 3 | 100.0000 | | 1000 | 227 | 227 | 100.0000 | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+
Conclusion: While 2200 points seems a lot, it's actually not, thus the huge variations.
Set 1 (more rounding)
- Increasing grain size to blocks of 20 (level=level/20, level=round(level), level=level*20)
+-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | level | successes | total tries | chance | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+ | 300 | 39 | 232 | 16.8103 | | 320 | 22 | 109 | 20.1835 | | 340 | 12 | 62 | 19.3548 | | 360 | 32 | 128 | 25.0000 | | 380 | 40 | 123 | 32.5203 | | 400 | 48 | 134 | 35.8209 | | 420 | 44 | 138 | 31.8841 | | 440 | 54 | 125 | 43.2000 | | 460 | 47 | 114 | 41.2281 | | 480 | 42 | 91 | 46.1538 | | 500 | 71 | 141 | 50.3546 | | 520 | 47 | 102 | 46.0784 | | 540 | 40 | 69 | 57.9710 | | 560 | 39 | 68 | 57.3529 | | 580 | 19 | 32 | 59.3750 | | 600 | 34 | 60 | 56.6667 | | 620 | 28 | 37 | 75.6757 | | 640 | 14 | 27 | 51.8519 | | 660 | 16 | 27 | 59.2593 | | 680 | 17 | 19 | 89.4737 | | 700 | 17 | 25 | 68.0000 | | 720 | 10 | 13 | 76.9231 | | 740 | 4 | 5 | 80.0000 | | 760 | 9 | 13 | 69.2308 | | 780 | 11 | 13 | 84.6154 | | 800 | 13 | 14 | 92.8571 | | 820 | 7 | 7 | 100.0000 | | 840 | 3 | 5 | 60.0000 | | 860 | 5 | 5 | 100.0000 | | 880 | 1 | 2 | 50.0000 | | 900 | 5 | 5 | 100.0000 | | 920 | 7 | 8 | 87.5000 | | 940 | 5 | 6 | 83.3333 | | 960 | 2 | 2 | 100.0000 | | 980 | 6 | 6 | 100.0000 | | 1000 | 230 | 230 | 100.0000 | +-------+-----------+-------------+----------+
Conclusion: A dataset of 10k would really be more useful. Oh well.